Difference between revisions of "Unit 3: Assessment and Evaluation"
m |
m |
||
| (30 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | [[Image:pin.gif]]'''Target objectives for Unit 3:''' | |
| − | + | ||
| + | ''Upon completion of this unit, participants will:'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. Understand assessment of online discussion activities. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. Conduct peer reviews of assessment tools. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | ''' | ||
| + | [[Image:pin.gif]] Activities:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. Create your own rubric to grade your student's discussion activities. Here are several resources on student assessment to get you started: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Bedard-Voorhees, A. (2005). Increasing Engagement for Online and Face-to-Face Learners Through Online Discussion Practices. The Cross Papers Number 8. Phoenix: League for Innovation in the Community College. [http://www.cos.edu/view_page.asp?nodeid=3885&parentid=3872&moduleid=1]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Edelstein & Edwards. (2002). If You Build It, They Will Come: Building Learning Communities Through Threaded Discussions. ''Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration'', Volume V, Number I, Spring 2002, State University of West Georgia, Distance Education Center. [http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring51/edelstein51.html]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Roblyer, M. D. and Ekhaml, L. ''How Interactive are YOUR Distance Courses? A Rubric for Assessing Interaction in Distance Learning''. State University of West Georgia. [http://www.westga.edu/~distance/roblyer32.html] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | 2. Post your completed rubric to the Angel Drop Box for peer review discussion activity. We will be discussing the project outcomes in the Discussion Forum for this Unit. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | ''' | ||
| + | [[Image:arr.GIF]] [[Unit 3 E-Lecture]] Assessment and Evaluation''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:Electure.jpg]] | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:pin.gif]]'''Reflection Activity:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. What are the most important considerations for assessment of student discussions? How will you evaluate your own students? Do you think sharing a rubric with your class serves to improve the quality of student posts? Post your reflection journal to the Angel course page. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | Learning | + | [[Image:pin.gif]]'''Please take a few minutes to provide me with your feedback, comments, and suggestions for this professional development workshop. I can be reached at: [mailto:amcs20078@gmail.com Anne Canale Stalnecker].''' |
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | [[Image:arr.GIF]] [[Facilitating Effective Online Discourse]] Home Page | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:arr.GIF]] [[Unit 1: The Learning Community and Online Discussions]] | ||
| − | + | [[Image:arr.GIF]] [[Unit 2: Constructing Online Discussion Activities]] | |
| − | + | [[Image:arr.GIF]] [[Unit 3: Assessment and Evaluation]] | |
| − | + | [[Image:arr.GIF]] [[References and Resources]] | |
| − | [ | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 21:47, 14 May 2008
Target objectives for Unit 3:
Upon completion of this unit, participants will:
1. Understand assessment of online discussion activities.
2. Conduct peer reviews of assessment tools.
Activities:
1. Create your own rubric to grade your student's discussion activities. Here are several resources on student assessment to get you started:
- Bedard-Voorhees, A. (2005). Increasing Engagement for Online and Face-to-Face Learners Through Online Discussion Practices. The Cross Papers Number 8. Phoenix: League for Innovation in the Community College. [1].
- Edelstein & Edwards. (2002). If You Build It, They Will Come: Building Learning Communities Through Threaded Discussions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume V, Number I, Spring 2002, State University of West Georgia, Distance Education Center. [2].
- Roblyer, M. D. and Ekhaml, L. How Interactive are YOUR Distance Courses? A Rubric for Assessing Interaction in Distance Learning. State University of West Georgia. [3]
2. Post your completed rubric to the Angel Drop Box for peer review discussion activity. We will be discussing the project outcomes in the Discussion Forum for this Unit.
Unit 3 E-Lecture Assessment and Evaluation
Reflection Activity:
1. What are the most important considerations for assessment of student discussions? How will you evaluate your own students? Do you think sharing a rubric with your class serves to improve the quality of student posts? Post your reflection journal to the Angel course page.
Please take a few minutes to provide me with your feedback, comments, and suggestions for this professional development workshop. I can be reached at: Anne Canale Stalnecker.
Facilitating Effective Online Discourse Home Page
Unit 1: The Learning Community and Online Discussions
Unit 2: Constructing Online Discussion Activities
