Talk:Paul Gervasio

From KNILT

Instructor comments on your project -- Jz833665 09:55, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

Hi Paul,

I'm very pleased to see the progress made in your design project. A few suggestions:

1) refine the statements of objectives, some of which are currently too vague. For example:

Participants will be able to use MS Movie Maker to integrate technology into the classroom and engage students at a higher level


"use MS Movie Maker to integrate technology into the classroom" does not make sense. Think about changing it to something like: Describe at least three benefits/usages of movie making in classroom to engage students actively in learning and understanding... (just an example to guide your thinking)


Participants will be able to assess learning by using technologically based lessons

I assume that your focus is on assessing students understanding/knowledge based their movie making activities, instead of assess all types of tech-based lessons.


2) Refine your task analysis and sequence the objectives in a more coherent way. Currently, your unit 1 begin with objectives about tech details, unit 2 focuses on lesson design, and unit 3 on assessment. My sense is that the participants need to understand the educational value of movie making (both verbal information and attitudes) before they'd want to learn about the tech details. So you unit 1 may begin with pedagogical use of movie making.

==Re: Instructor comments on your project -- Paul Gervasio 19:02, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

These are great suggestions. Thank you. I will implement this weekend.